The Case For Science in Biblical Creation: Génesis Re-examined Proving the Existence of God

No story in the Bible is under more assault to its eternal truth than the Creation story found at the very beginning in the book of Genesis. Modern science has made it almost unbelievable for all but the very faithful.This is a 2nd edition, adding even additional evidence for God’s existence. Genesis 1 Day 1 makes a precise prediction of liquid water on the surface of the Earth when the sun became a star. Recent discoveries in Early Earth science are revealing our planet cooled quicker than originally believed, and that much of the water came from the Earth itself. Evidence may soon prove that science and scripture in total agreement.Recent polling from Public Opinion Strategies found that only 26% of Gen Z believe in God and nearly half have never attended a religious service. No doubt, public schools have played a huge part since prayer and the teaching of the Biblical Creation has been removed from government education by the Supreme Court.Unfortunately, many of the religious have adopted an absolute belief that it’s not possible to explain the biblical creation in scientific terms. This requires either an outright rejection of modern science or an adoption of dubious conjectures impossible to prove. Worst still, some churches have completely capitulated to evolutionary science.But what if there were another way?Could the biblical Creation narrative be more scientific than anyone has ever determined before or could even believe? Could early earth science confirm the Creation story like archeology has done for other Biblical stories?Could godless evolution be replace with a God centered explanation where science can provide many of the missing details?A “Theistic terraforming?” What is this new concept, and can it explain how humanity and all life originated?In the last few decades, early earth science has made many advances in the conditions of our planet back then, whenever that actually occurred. Surprisingly, these discoveries explain why the story why and how the story is told.Could it be that it had to be