Ep. 304: Dworkin v. Hart on Legal Judgment (Part Two)

<p>Continuing on Roland Dworkin's "The Model of Rules" (1967) and Scott J. Shapiro's "The 'Hart-Dworkin' Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed" (2007), plus some of Dworkin's "Hard Cases" (1977).</p> <p>How do Hartians respond to Dworkin's initial attack? Can Hart's theory incorporate the fact that judges consult their culture's moral standards without making the law dependent on morality?</p> <p>Get more at <a href="https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/">partiallyexaminedlife.com</a>. Visit <a href="https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/support">partiallyexaminedlife.com/support</a> to get ad-free episodes and tons of bonus discussion including the supporter-exclusive part three to this episode.</p> <p>Sponsor: Check out the Profoundly Pointless podcast at <a title="" href="https://profoundlypointless.com/">profoundlypointless.com</a>.</p>