Disputes Digest #54 - Week of April 22, 2022

<p>Disputes Digest (Week of April 18)</p> Follow us on LinkedIn: <a href='https://www.linkedin.com/company/40833847/admin/'>https://www.linkedin.com/company/40833847/admin/</a> Check out our website: <a href='https://d.docs.live.net/10aa2d0dd6a3d304/Desktop/Tales%20of%20the%20Tribunal/Disputes%20Digest/TalesOfTheTribunal.com'>TalesOfTheTribunal.com</a> For Feedback, comments or submissions contact <a href='mailto:TalesOfTheTribunal@Gmail.com'>TalesOfTheTribunal@Gmail.com</a> News: <p>Take the TOT Vis Moot Survey: https://forms.gle/Ly3bjtV7HWH7Z6tT9</p> <p> </p> <p>Ukrainian Arbitration Association Call, <a href='http://arbitration.kiev.ua/en-US/UAA-News/Urgent-call-for-action-to-prevent-further-genocide-of-Ukrainians.aspx?ID=1167'>Here </a></p> <p>Guangzhou Court Ruling on Foreign Award, <a href='https://s.alphalawyer.cn/dist/index.html?1r1Ekp'>Here</a></p> <p>Nicaragua Wins at Sea, <a href='https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/court-colombia-infringed-nicaraguas-rights-caribbean-84211248'>Here </a></p> Australia Federal Court Decision, <a href='https://globalarbitrationnews.com/the-federal-court-of-australia-decided-on-whether-to-recognise-or-enforce-an-award-that-had-already-been-satisfied/'>Here</a> <p>9th Circuit Ruling on Online Arbitration, <a href='https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=fa64483e-1ad4-4a05-8e54-19bb237dc3e3&utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+General+section&utm_campaign=CIArb+North+America+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2022-04-19&utm_term='>Here </a></p> <p> </p> <p>None of the views shared today or any episode of Disputes Digest is presented as legal advice nor advice of any kind.  No compensation was provided to any organization or party for their inclusion on the show nor do any of the statements made represent any particular organization, legal position or view point.  All interviewees or organizations included appear on an arms-length basis and their appearance should not be construed as any bias or preferred