
BONDAGE OF THE WILLS COMPARED
🌚🥀
Description
PutsLuther (1525),Jonathan Edwards (1754), andOld School Baptists—Absoluter winginto one frame to compare “free will,” predestination, and lapsarian order.Moves fromdefinitions → doctrine → exegesis → pastoral use, then closes with a source-based Beebe section.Big thesesLuther:After the Fall the will isin bondage; conversion ismonergistic(God alone). Scripture’srevealed willguides preaching; thehidden willis adored, not dissected. Emphasis:Law/Gospeland assurance.Edwards:Compatibilism—we always choose according to thestrongest present motive; sinners havenatural abilitybutmoral inabilityto love God. Regeneration changes dispositions; God’s decree makes eventscertainwithoutcoercion.OSB (Absoluter):Absolute predestination of all things;immediate(non-means) regeneration; reject “duty-faith.” Tone issupralapsarian-leaning; “permission” language is viewed as too soft—preferdecree/governmentwhile denying God is theauthor of sin.Lapsarian placements (logical order of decrees)Luther:Doesn’t play the lapsarian game; functionallyinfralapsarianif forced (elect consideredas fallen), but officially sidesteps the schema.Edwards:Infrain order (fall then election) withend-firstteleology (God’s glory) that sounds supra-ish.OSB—Absoluter:Frequentlysupralapsarian in tone(election/reprobation ordered to God’s prior purpose; the fall serves the plan).Double predestination & “permission”Lutheran confessions:Single predestination(deny “double”); teach election forcomfortand refuse a decree to damnation.Edwards:Asymmetrical double predestination—active election;certain permission/preterition for the rest, withjust condemnationfor their sins (never equal ultimacy).Absoluter OSB:Push beyond “mere permission” toabsolute decreeof all events (still not authoring sin). Salvation isPlan A, not a patch.Luther’s book—chapter-by-chapter spineStakes: “free will” is thehinge.Scripture is clearon sin and grace.Revealed vs. hiddenwill distinction.“Free will” toward God is aname without a thingpost-Fall.Necessity ≠ coercion.God ordains all; not author
Uploader
Related Works
Episodes (6)
FOREWORD
Chapter by Chapter Summary of Luther’s Bondage of the Will (1525)
Did Luther And Edwards Deny Double Predestination?
Does not the term Permission imply a Plan B in the Mind of God?
How Would Beebe Have Viewed This Permission and Plan B Approach?
End Credits